Casino Security Concerns Raised as Caesars Entertainment Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Assault at Las Vegas Strip Restaurant

A woman from Nevada has launched a lawsuit against multiple parties, alleging that a significant failure in casino security left her vulnerable following a brutal assault two years ago. The incident, which she claims occurred at a restaurant located on the Strip’s Linq Promenade, highlights growing concerns regarding the adequacy of casino security protocols in protecting patrons in high-traffic areas.

According to The Las Vegas Review-Journal, Malissa Danielle Miles alleges that she was “violently assaulted” near the restroom of the Off The Strip Bistro & Bar on June 8, 2023. The lawsuit asserts that two unknown women struck her in the face and forcefully slammed her into a wall, leading to serious and permanent injuries, including a traumatic brain injury.

“Instead of contacting emergency services or securing the area to prevent further harm, the defendants’ agents and staff let the plaintiff—who was evidently suffering from cognitive impairment and trauma—wander through the casino unknowingly in a confused state,” the lawsuit indicates.

Miles is seeking general damages exceeding $15,000, with additional special damages to be determined at trial, along with statutory interest rates, attorney’s fees, and court costs.

At the time of the incident, Caesars Entertainment not only owned the Linq Hotel but also the Linq Promenade. The company sold the dining and retail plaza in December 2024 for $275 million to its present owner, a joint venture between TPG Real Estate and the Investment Management Platform of Acadia Realty Trust.

Key Takeaways from the Case

• Allegations of Assault: Malissa Danielle Miles claims she was violently attacked at a popular Las Vegas restaurant.
• Security Concern: The lawsuit criticizes the security protocols of Caesars Entertainment, claiming staff failed to assist a visibly injured person.
• Legal Proceedings: The lawsuit is filed in Clark County District Court, with potential damages exceeding $15,000.

This case raises significant questions about the responsibility of businesses to provide a safe environment for patrons and the adequacy of security measures in place. It highlights the ongoing concern surrounding personal safety in busy entertainment districts like the Las Vegas Strip.

Conclusion

The lawsuit filed by Malissa Danielle Miles against Caesars Entertainment underscores the critical importance of adequate security measures in public spaces, particularly in busy areas like the Las Vegas Strip. It remains to be seen how the court will adjudicate this case, but it certainly brings to light pressing issues about safety and accountability in the hospitality industry.

Blackjack Dealers in Vegas: Meet the Celebrity Dealers of Las Vegas

During the 1950s, the atmosphere of a Las Vegas casino was defined by a unique form of celebrity dealing that blurred the lines between entertainment and gaming. While most patrons were accustomed to professional blackjack dealers, the excitement peaked when prominent figures like Dean Martin stepped up to the tables. These stars would dazzle the crowds with their charm, momentarily replacing the standard staff to become the most sought-after blackjack dealers in the room.

Dean Martin reportedly dealt blackjack for fun between his performances at the Sands Casino. This glittering venue was partially funded by infamous mobsters, including Meyer Lansky and Frank Costello. Martin had honed his skills as a young man at the Rex Cigar Store, a front for illicit gambling in Steubenville, Ohio, during Prohibition.

According to Nick Tosches, in his book “Dino: Living High in the Dirty Business of Dreams,” there were at least two recorded instances of Martin dealing at the Sands, one in March 1956 and another in early 1959. The captivating photograph featured LIFE magazine, published in December 1958, likely showcases one of these events.

Likewise, legend has it that Frank Sinatra also tried his hand at dealing blackjack at the Sands during The Summit’s showcase, starting in 1960. This iconic gathering of stars never called themselves the Rat Pack, despite popular belief.

Sinatra’s foray into dealing was a mix of publicity, audience engagement, and asserting his influence in a casino he had stakes in. It encapsulated the glamour and allure of Las Vegas at the time.

It Was Still Illegal

During this era, just as now, one had to complete training and register with the Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) to deal at a casino. Neither Martin nor Sinatra fulfilled these requirements, but the casinos wouldn’t dare interrupt a game run by such high-profile figures.

Modern corporate casinos still cherish celebrity guest appearances, but now avoid activities that could lead to regulatory issues. Surprisingly, there have been no documented instances of celebrity dealers in Las Vegas since the likes of Dino and Ol’ Blue Eyes graced the tables. However, some venues once showcased “dealer-tainers,” combining gaming with entertainment.

• Celebrity guest appearances: Nowadays, celebrities are encouraged to appear in more compliant roles, such as hosting charity poker tournaments or playing at high-limit tables.
• Modern Gaming Regulations: If a celebrity wishes to serve alcohol, they too must complete the state-required TAM training.

Some aspects of the gambling scene certainly haven’t changed much over the years!

“Lost Vegas” is an occasional series from Casino.org that shines a light on the forgotten history of Las Vegas. Click here to explore other entries in this series.

If you have a captivating Vegas story that has slipped through the cracks of history, reach out to us!

How Casino Revenue Trends in Atlantic City Face Declines Amid Economic Concerns and Consumer Complaints

Key Highlights: The primary driver behind the performance and growth trends within the gaming sector is the consistent surge in casino revenue, which remains the central focus of these findings.

• Atlantic City operating profits decreased in Q1 2025
• Eight out of nine casinos remained profitable
• Bally’s reported an operating loss

In the first quarter of 2025, Atlantic City casinos generated a noticeable decline in revenue, leading to reduced operating margins. The latest reports from the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE) have highlighted a concerning trend in this iconic gaming destination.

According to the DGE, the total net revenue for the nine casinos reached $730.3 million, reflecting a 5.1% decrease compared to the previous year. This figure accounts for earnings from various sources, including casino gaming, hotel accommodations, dining, and online gaming.

The decline in revenue has inevitably led to lower profitability. The gross operating profit across these establishments was reported at nearly $132 million, representing a steep 15% drop compared to Q1 2024. Notably, only Hard Rock and Tropicana reported an increase in profits, whereas Bally’s reported an operational loss of $6.6 million.

Economic Pressures Affecting Atlantic City

Gross profits in this context indicate earnings before accounting for expenses like interest, taxes, and depreciation. The DGE underscored that these profits are critical indicators of financial health within the Atlantic City gaming sector.

New Jersey Casino Control Commission Chair, James Plousis, addressed the ongoing economic pressures faced by the casinos, noting that the escalating costs of goods and services are significantly impacting profit margins. According to him, “Atlantic City’s first quarter net revenue has fallen compared to the same periods over the past two years, reflecting broader economic challenges affecting regional gaming and tourism.”

The slump in performance witnessed in Q1 2025 followed a similar pattern observed in Q1 2024, where there was a nearly 9% decline in profits. Furthermore, in-person gambling activity in April fell almost 3%, while sportsbooks have reported a 15% drop in revenues compared to 2024.

The ongoing struggle for customers has also been reflected in hotel numbers. The nine casinos provided 15,424 guest accommodations, with an average occupancy rate of just 62.9%—the lowest since 2014, excluding the pandemic-affected Q1 2021. The average nightly rate was approximately $159, down 3% from the previous year.

Addressing Consumer Concerns

While officials indicate a recovery plan is underway, many consumers have voiced dissatisfaction with their experiences in Atlantic City. Comments collected from readers of Casino.org reflect sentiments of discontent, highlighting poor payouts and inadequate customer service.

Some customers have been vocal about their experiences: one noted frustration with slot machines not paying out, while another cited dissatisfaction with the lack of basic amenities in hotel rooms.

“Why would anyone drive to AC and waste money on expensive tolls and parking when there are casinos in Philly with free parking?”—a typical sentiment expressed by frustrated patrons.

The numerous complaints underscore a growing concern around the offerings in Atlantic City amidst its proclaimed attempts to rejuvenate and present itself as a premier destination.

In light of these issues, industry leaders will need to navigate the challenges posed by economic conditions and customer expectations to revive the allure of Atlantic City.

Conclusion

In summary, Atlantic City’s casinos have reported disappointing first-quarter profits, hindered by economic pressures and consumer complaints. With rising costs and operational challenges, sustaining profitability and attracting visitors remains paramount. The unfolding situation calls for strategic innovation and commitment to enhancing customer experiences to restore faith in this historically popular gambling hub.

Maximizing Returns Through Gaming Investments: Why IAC Favors MGM Over Other Deals

• Diller’s company owns 23% of MGM shares
• IAC has mulled other gaming investments, says an analyst

Barry Diller’s IAC/InterActiveCorp (NASDAQ: IAC) continues to view its 23% stake in MGM Resorts International (NYSE: MGM) as a “forever asset.” However, it hasn’t stopped exploring other potential gaming investments.

This information comes from a report by Truist Securities analyst Youssef Squali, after he recently met with CFO/COO Christopher Halpin and Vice President Mark Schneider in New York. The analysis highlights that IAC is still proactively involved with MGM, with both Diller and former IAC CEO Joey Levin serving on MGM’s board of directors. However, this has not limited IAC’s interest in assessing other deals within the gaming sector.

Squali stated, “Aside from advising MGM, IAC has explored deals within the real money gaming industry.” He went on to say that while IAC consults about potential mergers and acquisitions with MGM, there is no exclusive deal in place between IAC and MGM. It’s also notable that IAC holds valuable gaming licenses, creating a significant barrier for new entrants into the market.

While specific mentions of other gaming companies IAC is considering for investment weren’t disclosed, IAC has a well-established history of acquiring stakes in and revitalising internet-based businesses. This could mean they are focusing on areas such as iGaming or online sports betting when evaluating viable new investments in the gaming industry.

IAC Still Views MGM as Undervalued

IAC first acquired a 12% share in MGM, worth about $1 billion, in August 2020. As a result of additional acquisitions and the reduction of MGM’s public share availability through buybacks, IAC’s ownership has almost doubled since then.

Yet, IAC has refrained from overtly urging MGM to pursue transformative actions or shake up its leadership team, which is often a hallmark of traditional activist investor behaviour. However, they contend that MGM’s stock remains undervalued.

According to the analyst, “While IAC’s cost basis for MGM stock is $19 and the shares are currently trading above $31, the belief within management is that MGM continues to be grossly undervalued, trading at 3.5x EBITDA when considering BetMGM along with MGM China.”

IAC: A Credible Alternative to Owning MGM

IAC may serve as a “synthetic” way for investors to hold MGM stock. Squali emphasises that investors frequently question the merits of owning IAC over directly possessing MGM shares.

“Here, we believe that ownership of IAC provides investors with an attractive cost basis for investing in MGM (at $19/share), while also offering exposure to the rest of IAC’s portfolio and a commitment to shareholder-friendly capital allocation,” concludes the analyst.

It’s plausible that IAC may increase its stake in MGM in the coming months. Earlier this year, Diller indicated that this was a potential scenario on the horizon.

In summary, Barry Diller’s IAC remains a fervent supporter of MGM Resorts, holding a significant share while also keeping an eye on new opportunities in the gaming industry. With its track record of strategic investments, IAC stands poised to be a significant player in shaping the future of the gaming landscape.

Ontario Reports Second Best Online Casino Revenue Numbers Ever

Ontario’s gaming landscape is experiencing an unprecedented surge in popularity, largely driven by the rapid expansion of the online casino sector. Recent data reveals some incredible news for the province: April marked the second-best month ever for gross gaming revenue (GGR) since the market took off three years ago, coming in at CA$313.3 million. This impressive figure, fueled by the growing accessibility of digital betting, trails only January’s record of CA$328.4 million.

• Reduction in sports betting revenue: Two months consecutively have shown a year-over-year decline in sports betting revenue.
• Increasing Player Accounts: There’s been a slight increase in active player accounts from March.
• Total Cash Wagering Figures: For April, the cash wagers amounted to CA$7.795 billion.

According to the latest market performance report released by iGaming Ontario, total cash wagers for April 2025 decreased by 2% from the previous month. However, this NAGGR figure represents a 6% increase from March, showing resilience in the market.

Active player accounts for April stood at 1.091 million, showing a 3% increase from March, with an average spend of $287 per player. Currently, there are 49 licensed iGaming operators operating within Ontario and a total of 83 gaming websites available to players.

Casino Dominates the Market

As usual, the casino segment is the power generator for the market. Cash wagers on the casino side reached CA$6.58 billion, showing a minor 1% decline from March, thus capturing a substantial 84% market share. In comparison, cash wagers for all betting activities—this includes sports, esports, prop, and novelty bets—totalled CA$1.07 billion, representing a 10% decrease and forming a mere 14% of the market share.

Peer-to-peer poker also saw a decline, with a total of CA$144 million in cash wagered, resulting in a 2% market share.

Looking ahead, early indicators for 2025 suggest a concerning trend in sports betting, which has experienced two consecutive months of year-over-year decline. March was particularly unkind with sports betting revenue reported at CA$48 million, a drop from CA$51 million in March 2024, and down from CA$65 million in April 2024.

It’s common to see a dip in sports betting revenues during the warmer months until the peak NFL season ramps up.

Key Takeaways:

• April’s GGR of CA$313.3 million is the second highest since the market’s inception.
• Total cash wagers for April reached CA$7.795 billion, with casino wagers dominating the market share.
• A slight increase in the number of active player accounts indicates a healthy interest in online gambling.

In conclusion, while there are challenges faced by sports betting in Ontario’s gaming market, the overall numbers present a positive outlook for the iGaming sector. The continued dominance of casinos assures a robust environment for growth and player engagement.